Published: 10/02/2010
“His (Hun Sen) wish on the website for "evil events to befall" PM Abhisit is diplomatically indefensible."
Hun Sen had many reasons to make the "wish". The Thai troops intrusion deep inside Cambodia and the ocupation of the Cambodian territory on 15 July 2008 is one; the distortion of the facts that the Temple of Preah Vihear “is on the border,” that is 2; the disinformation, for example saying that there is an "overlapping area", then "a disputed area", and finally "Thailand's teritory of 4.6Km2". In fact it was just recently that Thailand drew a unilateral map, in the same manner as Hitler and Mussolini, and sent the Nazis and the Fascists to occupy the others Nations, that 3... and there are many others.
Did or din't Thai troops invaded Cambodia, recently, as of 15 July 2008? Abhisit must say and swear, and that is the end of it. The way Abhisit has been doing to Cambodia is it statesmanly and internationally acceptable, needless to quesion whether or not it is dipomatically defensible?
"The Thai prime minister did the right thing by ignoring the repeated and primitive verbal assaults; so it is Hun Sen who lost face." It was Hun Sen who unmasked the "devil" behind the diplomatic, but macchiavellan smile of Abhisit. If Abhisit is a master in disinformation, distortion of the facts, and misinformation, Hun Sen was right not to use something, some sort of methodologies that Abhisit is master at it. Abhisit ignored things behind the dead wall is the reason to receive bags of human excrements from his own people (the fact is that he received bags of human excrements in his guarded compound.) The recommendation of BKK to Abhist is inappropriate. Verbal assaults are not as bad as human excrements, for Abhisit.
Therefore, who lost face? I think that the guy who receives bags of human excrements as gift or sign of protest lost his face.
"He (Hun Sen)should reconsider this sort of distasteful rhetoric, which certainly fails to advance his own cause." Hun Sen's "cause" is to defend his country against foreign invasion. Verbal asaults and weapons must be used against invaders. In fact Thai troops invaded Cambodia on 15 July 2008. I found that Hun Sen has his ways to deal with Abhisit who is a liar, a master of disinformation and distortion of the facts.It must be recalled that Abhisit ascended to
become Prime Minister of Thailand by being one of the leaders of the "YELLOW SHIRTS" as well as Kasit, who now enjoyed a double standard treatment from the system created by the 2006 Coup.
It would be wiser for Abhisit to learn history and he must know that the WORLD will never allow Thailand to be the 21st century foreign land robber. 1962 at The Hague and 1946 at Washington DC are well recorded in history and the related rule of law applies.
William
11 February 2010
“His (Hun Sen) wish on the website for "evil events to befall" PM Abhisit is diplomatically indefensible."
Hun Sen had many reasons to make the "wish". The Thai troops intrusion deep inside Cambodia and the ocupation of the Cambodian territory on 15 July 2008 is one; the distortion of the facts that the Temple of Preah Vihear “is on the border,” that is 2; the disinformation, for example saying that there is an "overlapping area", then "a disputed area", and finally "Thailand's teritory of 4.6Km2". In fact it was just recently that Thailand drew a unilateral map, in the same manner as Hitler and Mussolini, and sent the Nazis and the Fascists to occupy the others Nations, that 3... and there are many others.
Did or din't Thai troops invaded Cambodia, recently, as of 15 July 2008? Abhisit must say and swear, and that is the end of it. The way Abhisit has been doing to Cambodia is it statesmanly and internationally acceptable, needless to quesion whether or not it is dipomatically defensible?
"The Thai prime minister did the right thing by ignoring the repeated and primitive verbal assaults; so it is Hun Sen who lost face." It was Hun Sen who unmasked the "devil" behind the diplomatic, but macchiavellan smile of Abhisit. If Abhisit is a master in disinformation, distortion of the facts, and misinformation, Hun Sen was right not to use something, some sort of methodologies that Abhisit is master at it. Abhisit ignored things behind the dead wall is the reason to receive bags of human excrements from his own people (the fact is that he received bags of human excrements in his guarded compound.) The recommendation of BKK to Abhist is inappropriate. Verbal assaults are not as bad as human excrements, for Abhisit.
Therefore, who lost face? I think that the guy who receives bags of human excrements as gift or sign of protest lost his face.
"He (Hun Sen)should reconsider this sort of distasteful rhetoric, which certainly fails to advance his own cause." Hun Sen's "cause" is to defend his country against foreign invasion. Verbal asaults and weapons must be used against invaders. In fact Thai troops invaded Cambodia on 15 July 2008. I found that Hun Sen has his ways to deal with Abhisit who is a liar, a master of disinformation and distortion of the facts.It must be recalled that Abhisit ascended to
become Prime Minister of Thailand by being one of the leaders of the "YELLOW SHIRTS" as well as Kasit, who now enjoyed a double standard treatment from the system created by the 2006 Coup.
It would be wiser for Abhisit to learn history and he must know that the WORLD will never allow Thailand to be the 21st century foreign land robber. 1962 at The Hague and 1946 at Washington DC are well recorded in history and the related rule of law applies.
William
11 February 2010