Skip to main content

As Thailand Ratchets up War Rhetoric, Fueled by the PAD, Questions Remain on Reluctance for Outside Mediation



Border conflict is one of the most pervasive and inevitable features of all social systems, however simple or complex, they maybe and irrespective of their location in time and space.  Wherever it occurs, conflicts are significant, noteworthy, newsworthy and challenging. It produces acrimony, hostility and violence.
In this regard, all eyes will be on the UN Security Council this Monday when Cambodia’s Foreign Minister Foreign Hor Nam Hong, will state Cambodia’s case to the UNSC on the following:
·         Thailand’s continued aggressive posture on Cambodia
·         Thailand’s use of cluster bombs on Cambodia in last week’s fighting
·         Thailand’s use of unknown chemical warfare (Toxic Gas) on Cambodia
·         Thailand chastising UNESCO for agreeing to send an assessment team to assess the damages of the 900 year old Preah Vihear temple and pagoda by Thailand’s incessant artillery bombardment
·         Displacing more than 10,000 Cambodia’s villagers by destroying the markets and their homes and making it unsafe by Thai’s firing cluster bombs
·         Thailand’s intransigence on wanting to impose its unilateral will on Cambodia’s sovereign territory of Preah Vihear
·         Thailand’s persistent rejection of international and multi-lateral intervention to resolve the border issue with Cambodia because Thai has hidden political agenda by trying to seize Cambodia’s land.
·         Calling for Cambodia to withdraw troops while Thailand is building up her troops of more than 25,000 strong forces supported by more than 100 tanks and armored carriers, fighter jets and batteries of heavy artillery near Cambodia’s border.
·         Thailand also armed her civilians with shot guns near the Cambodia-Thai border, thus hoping to say to the whole world  that Cambodia fired on innocents when the armed Thais will  become in the USA’s infamous words “Enemy Combatants”
·          Thailand’s threat to pull out of UNESCO if it did not delist Preah Vihear as a World Heritage, showing Thai did not respect the World Heritage Committee’s decision to which Thai had provided its thump print.
Thai Foreign Minister Kasit Piromya has lots to answer to the 15-members of UNSC. Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa, in his capacity as chair of the ASEAN Standing Committee, will also make a statement.
History shows that Thailand takes on an intransigent attitude towards multi-lateral mediation or intervention in what is no more a bi-lateral matter between Cambodia and Thailand.  Thailand, by its threats to UNESCO and also calling for UNESCO to delist Preah Vihear from the World Heritage List has forfeited its rights to bilateral negotiations.
This time Thailand tried again. It was hoping to pressure Cambodia to withdraw its complaint to the UNSC. Not this time! The world knew and was watching. If Thailand is indeed innocent of the above accusations, it should welcome international mediation with open arms as than, plausibly than, the whole border situation can be resolved once and for all.
Thailand would not want that? Thailand is fully aware that it had bowed to pressure from the PAD and invaded Cambodia, with the foolish hope of gaining territory and using it as a leverage to free the two imprisoned Thai spies and show goodwill by withdrawing its troops from Cambodian territory.
Fat fetched? No! The fact speaks for itself. 
Cambodia has tried time and again to abide by the spirit of the 2000 MOU which calls for the Joint Border Commission (JBC) to resolve the issue. Alas, that was never the case as Thailand always used the JBC to launch attacks on Cambodia. This was no different this time around.
When Kasit was in Siem Reap to attend the JBC, Thailand’s armed forces were preparing the invasion of Cambodia. As the talks ended, the Thai army invaded. Why is this so? Because the PAD demanded the MOU be abandoned and Thailand use whatever means necessary to take Preah Vihear  and annex Cambodian territory, just as she has done in the past centuries.
Thailand is fearful of international intervention. It is fully aware that if this dispute becomes internationalized, Thailand will lose face in the long run, as the 1962 ruling will be amplified and make Thailand look as if it is still crying over spilled milk.
So what can Kasit tell the Security Council that will make any difference? Nothing really, except accuse Cambodia of firing first, probably making hefty illustrations how Thailand was forced to take military action in retaliation for Cambodia firing flares into her skies to detect sneaking Thai army infiltrators?
How Thailand was forced to use unconventional weapons and 155 mm artillery batteries to take out these flare positions? How heavy artillery was used to swat Cambodian “flare flies” from the skies, and using that as an excuse to fire cluster bombs at Cambodian villagers?
Thailand should be afraid, very afraid. It has been caught with her hand in the cookie jar – invading Cambodian territory, prelude to which was Thai politicians and ultra nationalists intentionally trespassing into Cambodian territory, fact which has been openly admitted by everyone at Thailand, including the military and the perpetrators themselves by the incriminating video clip.
Indonesia has brushed aside Thai insistence on bilateral talks to "invite" all 10 ASEAN foreign ministers to discuss the Cambodian border problem. So has the UNSC.
Why is Thailand afraid of settling its dispute with Cambodia through intermediaries when decades of bilateral talks have failed?  The practice of settling disputes through intermediaries has had a rich history in all cultures and society.
Cambodia has opted for international mediation as she is tired of the lies and aggressive postures of the Thai’s administration and army. Cambodia needs international intervention to protect (her) its heritage and more importantly, what is now the universal heritage – the Preah Vihear temple.
Any effort by Thailand to prevent international mediations from finding solution to settle the border issue is regarded as a travesty of justice, which against all acceptable norms.
It indicates all too well, Thailand’s intransigence of wanting to keep the conflict alive for its domestic political agenda, much to the chagrin of Cambodia, a victim of Thailand’s aggression and the world community which has chosen to stop sitting on the sidelines and get involved to bring peace, order and stability to the region and the two countries in particular.
Thailand should welcome this. Not oppose this.
T. Mohan, a long time political analyst based in Cambodia.

Popular posts from this blog

ប្រវត្តិរបស់មហាក្សត្រីអង្គមុី ឬអង្គមិញ ដែលយួនលើកបន្តប់ជាមហាក្សត្រីខ្មែរទី៩៧

ព្រះមហាក្សត្រីអង្គមីុ ឬ អង្គមេញ ទ្រង់ជាមហាក្សត្រីខ្មែរទី៩៧ នៃរាជាណាចក្រខ្មែរឧដុង្គ ទ្រង់គឺជាអ្នកមានអំណាចម្នាក់នៅក្នុងចំនោមស្ត្រីបីនាក់នៅសម័យនោះដែរ។ ព្រះនាងត្រូវបានវៀតណាមលើកឲ្យក្លាយជាព្រះមហាក្សត្រីខ្មែរ នៅក្នុងអំឡុងពេលដែលក្រុងកម្ពជាមានសង្រ្គាមជាមួយសៀម។ ព្រះនាង គឺជាសែលោហិតរាជវង្សនរោត្តម មិនតែប៉ុណ្ណោះទេទ្រង់មានឥសរយស្សជា សម្តេចសិល្បៈករប្រចាំក្រុងកម្ពុជានាសម័យនោះ ព្រះអង្គឡើងគ្រោងរាជចាប់ពីឆ្នាំ (១៨៣៥-១៨៤១) ព្រះអង្គសោយរាជ្យបានរយៈពេល៦ឆ្នាំ។ ព្រះអង្គឡើងសោយរាជ្យបន្តពីព្រះបាទឧទ័យរាជា (ព្រះ បាទឧទ័យរាជា ជាទទៅនៅសម័យនោះគេហៅព្រអង្គថាអង្គច័ន្ទ) ទ្រង់ឡើងសោយរាជ្យបន្តពីបិតារបស់ព្រះអង្គ គឺព្រះអង្គអេង។ នៅរាជសម័យបន្ទាប់ពីព្រះមហាក្សត្រីអង្គមុី គឺព្រះបាទហរិរះរាមាឥសារាធិបតី ដែលយើងស្គាល់គ្រប់គ្នាគឺ ព្រះបាទអង្គឌួង ព្រះអង្គប្រសូត្រនៅឆ្នាំ១៧៩៦ ហើយសោយទីវង្គត់ នៅខែតុលា ឆ្នាំ ១៨៦០ ក្នុងព្រះជន ៦៤ព្រះវវស្សា ព្រះអង្គគឺជាក្សត្រមួយអង្គដែលបានសង្រ្គោះកម្ពុជាពីកន្តាប់ដៃសៀមនឹងវៀតណាម។ ព្រះអង្គឡើងសោយរាជចាប់ពីឆ្នាំ ១៨៤៧ ដល់ ១៨៦០។  ព្រះមហាក្សត្រីអង្គមីុ សោយទិវង្គត់នៅ ក្នុងខែធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ១៨៧៤ ក្នុងព្រះជន្មាយុ ៥៩ ព្រះវវស្សា ក្ន...

សារ​លិខិត​រំលែក​ទុក្ខ​របស់ ឯកឧត្តម Kim Sung-Hwan រដ្ឋមន្រ្តី​ការ​បរទេស​នៃ​សាធារ​ណ​រដ្ឋកូរ៉េ ជូន សមេ្តច​អគ្គម​ហាសេនា​បតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន សែន នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី នៃព្រះ​រាជា​ណាច​ក្រកម្ពុជា

Cambodia and Japan commit to preserve heritage site as oil and gas exploration begins in Preah Vihear

PHNOM PENH, Jan. 30, 2012 – The Japanese Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC) agreed with Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Dr. Sok An in a meeting on Monday that the historic temples of Preah Vihear province must be protected and conserved. H.E. Dr. Sok An, Minister in Charge of the Office of the Council of Ministers, told Akira Suzuki, Executive Director and member of the Board of JOGMEC, that there are more than 200 historic sites in the province, including the Temple of Preah Vihear. Dr. Sok An said that it is very important that such cultural heritage be cared for so as to attract more tourists to the area. Already there are 2,000 tourists per day visiting Preah Vihear province. The province is also rich in mineral resources and fertile land for agriculture, he said. The area is also a home of an endangered bird that is attractive to tourists. “If we can discover oil and gas, that is a very good asset for Preah Vihear province and for Cambodia as a w...

រាយនាមព្រះមហាក្សត្រខ្មែរ និងរាជសម័យនៃការគ្រប់គ្រងប្រទេស

ការសិក្សាស្រាវជ្រាវអំពីប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ​ខ្មែរ មិនមែនជារឿងងាយទេ ដោយសារតែគ្មានឯកសារច្បាស់លាស់បន្សល់ទុក​ឱ្យស្រាវជ្រាវ។ ដូច្នេះយើងត្រូវតែកកាយរើមួយម្តងមួយផ្នែកៗ មករៀបចំផ្គុំគ្នាដើម្បីឱ្យបានឃើញការពិតពីមួយសម័យកាលទៅមួយសម័យទៀត។ ខាងក្រោមនេះ គឺជាការស្រាវជ្រាវប្រវត្តិនៃការគ្រប់គ្រងរបស់ព្រះមហាក្សត្រខ្មែរ និងព្រះនាមរបស់ទ្រង់នីមួយៗ៖ * សម័យនគរភ្នំ (ហ្វូណន សវទី១ ៥៥០ គស) 1. ព្រះនាងសោមាហៅលីវយី (ដើមសតវត្សទី១) 2. កៅណ្ឌិន្យ(៦៨) 3. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម (សតវត្សទី២) 4. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម ចិនហៅ បាន់ ហួង (សតវត្សទី២) 5. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម ចិនហៅ ហ្វាន់ហ្វាន់(ដើមសតវត្សទី៣) 6. ស្រីម៉ារ៉ា ចិនហៅ ចេម៉ាន់(២០៥- ២២៥) 7. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាមចិនហៅ Fan chin sheng(២២៥) 8. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម ចិនហៅហ្វាន់ចាន់(២២៥ -២៤០) 9. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម ចិនហៅហ្វាន់សីុយន់(២៤០- ២៨៧) 10. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម(សតវត្សទី៣ ) 11. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាមចិនហៅតៀនជូ ចាន់តាន(សតវត្សទី៤) 12. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម(សតវត្សទី៤ ) 13. កៅណ្ឌិន្យទី២ចិនហៅចាវចិនជូ( ? ៤៣៤) 14. ស្រី =ន្រ្ទវរ្ម័ន(៤៣៤- ៤៣៥) 15. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម មិនស្គាល់រជ្ជកាល 16. មិនស្គាល់ព្រះនាម មិនស្គាល់រជ្ជកាល 17. កៅណ្ឌិន្យ...

Cambodia and Malaysia look to further cooperation in agriculture, tourism and education sectors

PHNOM PENH, February 20, 2014  – Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sok An and Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister shared views on Thursday that both countries can tap mutual benefits and complement each other. Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Education Tan Sri Muhyiddin informed H.E. Sok An that, “Malaysia is good at rubber plantations, palm oil, and technology and the key is how best to work with Cambodia.” He said that Malaysian companies are interested in investing in processing rubber resin and can make good furniture from old rubber trees in Cambodia. Malaysian state run companies can also explore energy, generation, hydro-power plants and infrastructures such as roads in Cambodia. “We need feasibility studies first before the next steps can be taken. We can provide resources under the plan of privatization,” H.E. Tan Sri Muhyiddin said in the meeting. In response, H.E. Dr. Sok An, also Minister in charge of the Office of the Council of Minist...